Voropaeva T. S.

The role of personality in ukrainian history through biographical studies

Section: Theoretical and methodical problems of biographic researches

Abstract: The article considers role of personality in Ukrainian history. A comprehensive scientific study of the role of personality in history Ukrainian envisages the combination individual-biographical, subjective-activity and socio-typological approach. The suggested integrative methodology that combines conceptual potential of biographical, historical psychology and social philosophy and psychology, allows you to build a new cognitive strategy to resolve of the put problem. The article identified the main criteria for analysis of the nature, significance and specificity of multifaceted activities of prominent historical figures

Keywords: Biography Studies, biographical method, History of Ukraine, personality, subject, historical personality, integrative methodology

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/ub.14.050     Citation

• Voropaeva T. S. (Kiev National Taras Shevchenko University (Kiev))

Cite:
Voropaeva T. S. (2016). The role of personality in ukrainian history through biographical studies. Biographistica Ukrainica, (14) 50-70. (In Ukrainan). https://doi.org/10.15407/ub.14.050

References:

1. Batkin, L. M. (1990). K sporam o logiko-istoricheskom opredelenii individualnosti [For disputes about the definition of logical and historical of individuality]. In Odissei. Chelovek v istorii [Odysseus. Man in History]. (Pp. 59–76). Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].
2. Bychko, A. K. and Bychko, I. V. (1987). Chelovek v mirovozzrencheskoi kartine bylinnogo eposa [The man in the ideological picture epos]. In Chelovek i istoriia srednevekovoi filosofskoi mysli russkogo, ukrainskogo i belorusskogo narodov [The man and the history of medieval philosophical thought of Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian peoples]. (Pp. 20–30). Kyiv: Naukova dumka. [in Russian]
3. Voropaeva, T. S. (1989). Psikhologicheskie usloviia formirovaniia grazhdanskoi pozitcii lichnosti v rannem iunosheskom vozraste [Psychological conditions of formation of civic identity in early adolescence]. In Problemy vozrastnoi psikhologii. Tez. dokl. k VII sezdu Obshchestva psikhologov SSSR [Problems of of age psychology. Abstracts to the VII Congress of the Society of Psychologists of the USSR]. (Pp. 117–118). Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].
4. Voropaeva, T. S. (1987). Sotcialno-psikhologicheskie aspekty formirovaniia grazhdanskoi pozitcii lichnosti [Socio-psychological aspects of formation of civil position of personality]. In Obshchee i osobennoe preobrazovanie obshchestvennykh otnoshenii. Sb. nauchn. tr. [General and special transformation of social relations. Collection of scientific papers]. (Pp. 53–59). Kyiv: KGU. [in Russian]
5. Voropaeva, T. S. (1990). Strukturnye i tipologicheskie osobennosti grazhdanskoi pozitcii kak sistemoobrazuiushchego faktora aktivnosti lichnosti [Structural and typological features of civil position as a backbone factor activity of the person]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Psihology). Kyiv. [in Russian]
6. Voropaieva, T. S. and Poluboiarynova, O. I. (1994). Teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy stanovlennia istorychnoi psykholohii [Theoretical and methodological basis of formation of historical psychology]. In Osobystist i narod: pohliad istorychnoi psykholohii [The personality and nation: historical look of psychology]. (Pp. 14–15). Kyiv: Instytut psykholohii im. H. S. Kostiuka. [in Ukrainian]
7. Vygotskii, L. (1984). Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. [Collected Works] (6-th ed.). Vol. 4. Moscow: Pedagogika. [in Russian]
8. Gurevich, A. Ia. (1990). Eshche neskolko zamechanii k diskussii o lichnosti i individualnosti v istorii kultury [A few more remarks to the debate about the personality and individuality in the history of culture]. In Odissei. Chelovek v istorii [Odysseus. Man in History]. (Pp. 76–90). Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian]
9. Zashkilniak, L. O. (2005). Intelektualna istoriia: sproba konventsii (deiaki metodolohichni mirkuvannia) [Intellectual history: an attempt Convention (some methodological considerations)]. In Eidos. Almanakh teorii ta istorii istorychnoi nauky [Eidos. Almanac on Theory and History of Historical Science]. (Vol. 1, pp. 28–36). Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian]
10. Istoriia Drevnego Rima [History of Ancient Rome]. (1982). Moscow: Vysshaia shkola. [in Russian]
11. Kiev. Entciklopedicheskii spravochnik [Kyiv. Encyclopedic Handbook]. (1985). Kyiv: Glavnaia redaktciia Ukrainskoi Sovetskoi Entciklopedii. [in Russian].
12. Kyiv v istorii filosofii Ukrainy [Kyiv in History of Philosophy of Ukraine]. (2000). Kyiv: Vyd. dim "KM Academia". [in Ukrainian]
13. Kon, I. S. (1978). Otkrytie "Ia" [The discovery of the "I"]. Moscow: Politizdat. [in Russian]
14. Korzh, N. H. and Lutska, F. I. (1988). Iz skarbnytsi antychnoi mudrosti [From the treasury of ancient wisdom]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola. [in Ukrainian]
15. Losev, A. F. (1969). Istoriia antichnoi estetiki. (Sofisty. Sokrat. Platon) [History of ancient aesthetics. (Sophists. Socrat. Platon)]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. [in Russian]
16. Losev, A. F. (1982). Estetika Vozrozhdeniia [The aesthetics of the Renaissance]. Moscow: Mysl. [in Russian]
17. Petrovskii, A. V. and Petrovskii, V. A. (2000). Kategorialnaia sistema psikhologii [Categorical system of psychology]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology], 5, 3–17. [in Russian]
18. Potapova, V. D. (2001). Ne formuiuchy, a rozvyvaiuchy [Not forming and developing]. Humanitarni nauky [Humanitary Sciences], 2, 37–40. [in Ukrainian]
19. Rubinshtein, S. L. (1957). Bytie i soznanie [Being and consciousness]. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR. [in Russian]
20. Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv [The dictionary of foreign words]. (1974). Kyiv: Ukrainska radianska entsyklopediia. [in Ukrainian]
21. Stoliarov, A. A. (1991). Avrelii Avgustin. Zhizn, uchenie i ego sudby [Aurelius Augustine. The life, teachings, and his fate]. In Avrelii Avgustin. Ispoved [Aurelius Augustine. Confession]. (Pp. 5–50). Moscow: Izdatelstvo "Renessans". [in Russian]
22. Tolochko, P. (1996). Kyivska Rus [Kievan Rus]. Kyiv: Abrys. [in Ukrainian]
23. Universalnyi slovnyk-entsyklopediia [Universal Dictionary Encyclopedia]. (2003). Kyiv: Novyi druk. [in Ukrainian]
24. Filosofskii entciklopedicheskii slovar [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. (2003). Moscow: Infra-M. [in Russian]
25. Nedoncelle, M. (1948). Prosopon et persona dans l’Antiquite classique. In Revue des Sciences religieuses. (Vol. 22, pp. 277–299) doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/rscir.1948.1865